Science and truth

 I will talk about the truth and science. The fossil record is an embarrassment to evolutionist. It demonstrates that transitional forms from one kind to another are mythological. While the general person on the street are unaware of the fact that transitions from one kind to another do not exist, it is common knowledge among paleontologists. 

There have been ape-man fiction, fraud and fantasy with evolution. The Pithecanthropus erectus is fictitious, Piltdown man was a fraud and Peking man is pure fantasy. To say that "hominids"  like Peking man and his partners are closely related to humans because both can walk is like saying that a hummingbird and a helicopter are closely related because both can fly. The distance between an ape who cannot read or write and a descendant of Adam who can compose a musical masterpiece or send someone to the moon is the distance of infinity.

Image asserting that the majestic Messiah composed itself apart from Handel or that the Last Supper painted itself without Leonardo de Vinci. We need to consider some even more egregious notions-that an eye, an egg or the earth, each in its vast complexity, came into existence by blind chance. As we see, forming even a protein molecule by random processes is not only improbable but is also, indeed,  impossible.

We need to test the theory of evolution in light of reason and empirical science rather than rhetoric and emotional stereotypes. The basic laws of science, including the laws of effects and their causes, energy conservation and entropy undergird the creation model for origins and undermine the evolutionary model.

I will talk about the idea of Recapitulation. It is better known by the once popular evolutionary phrase "Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny," is the notion that in the course of an embryo's development, the embryo repeats the evolutionary history of its species. Thus, at various points, an emerging human is a fish, a frog and finally a fetus. This theory, first championed by a German biologist named Ernst Haeckel, is not only based on revisionism but also been used as justification for Roe v. Wade and for racism.