People love to watch programs on wild animals. The animals of this world is interesting. The Cheetah is a fast animal that many television programs focus on. The television programs will mention Macro Evolution. They deny God and they praise Macro Evolution.
If a person reads the Bible then the Bible will give some answers. If a person reads the fifth day of creation then a person will see something different. The Bible doesn't endorse Macro Evolution. The scientist have a different history on the beginning. The scientist will deny the Bible.
Many Christians will accept Macro Evolution. They will say this. God can use Macro Evolution even if the science books deny the account of God.
God have kinds of animals. A dog is a dog. God made the cat, the cat is a cat. I hear this argument, a person will mention the drawings in a science book. There is a diagram of the progression of Macro Evolution.
The artist who draw the progression of Macro Evolution have imagination but no science. A museum can have different drawing of a exhibit. You can see a exhibit in one city then you will see a different drawing from a different exhibit in London. This is called imagination and not science.
Many scientists will see a pig tooth and a skull and then they create a Ape Man. This is a interesting story.
When Dr Henry Fairfield Osborn, head of the Department of
Palaeontology at New York’s American Museum of Natural History received
the fossil tooth in February 1922, he would have thought it a gift from
the gods had he believed in any god at all. Marxist in his views and
prominent member of the American Civil Liberties Union, he was aware
that plans were being made by the union to challenge the
Christian-backed legislation that forbade the teaching of evolution in
American schools. He saw the tooth as precious evidence for the test
case which was eventually held in 1925 at Dayton, Tennessee, and became
known as the ‘Scopes Monkey Trial’.
The trial was an arranged affair, but the tooth was not brought in
as evidence because there was dissension. The truth leaked out slowly
and obscurely in the
American Museum Novitiates for January 6,
1923, where nine authorities cited their objections to the claim that
the tooth was anywhere near related to the primate. A further search was
made at Snake Creek, the site of the original discovery, and by 1927 it
was begrudgingly concluded that the tooth was that of a species of
Prosthennops,
an extinct genus related to the modern peccary or wild pig. These facts
were not considered generally newsworthy but did appear in
Science (1927, 66:579). The fourteenth edition of the
Encyclopaedia Britannica
(1929, 14:767) coyly admitted that a mistake had been made and that the
tooth belonged to a ‘being of another order’. The burden of
embarrassment was thus eased for the now retired Henry Fairfield Osborn.
This is not the whole story, however. While the pundits dismissed
the affair, believing that the tooth was that of an extinct pig, in 1972
Ralph Wetzel discovered a herd of these very animals alive and well in
Paraguay’s Chaco. Wetzel gave a complete description of the discovery in
Science (1975, 189:379), where the animals were consigned to the genus
Catagonus ameghino. It was admitted, however, that this new species is similar to the extinct species
Catagonus wagneri. Once again, the fossil record becomes a mere yesterday.
Genesis 1:24-25
24 And God said, “Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: the livestock, the creatures that move along the ground, and the wild animals, each according to its kind.” And it was so. 25 God made the wild animals
according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and
all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.
